Author(s): OSTERWALD, K., KELLY, D., Ó CATHAIN, C., Institution: INNSBRUCK UNIVERSITY, Country: AUSTRIA, Abstract-ID: 468

INTRODUCTION:
Resisted sprint training (RST) has gained popularity for enhancing sprint performance [1]. However, to our knowledge, there remains a lack of clarity on coaches’ understanding and application of RST. This study aimed to explore coaches perspectives on RST, focusing on their understanding of kinematics, decision-making processes, and perceptions of this training method.
METHODS:
A web-based survey was conducted with 52 coaches from various sports settings. Questions covered coaches’ background information, education, their perception of how RST influences kinematics, equipment and methods used. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were employed for data analysis.
RESULTS:
The majority (92%) of surveyed coaches expressed a belief in the efficacy of RST for enhancing sprint performance, with notable variations based on coaching qualifications. Scientific or Coaching Journals were their primary sources of information (90%), and coaches demonstrated a high confidence level in their theoretical knowledge. Notably, 73% of coaches believe RST induces acute changes in sprinting technique, leading to adjustments in training loads. Coaches expressed concerns about negative impacts on unresisted sprint performance (14.6%). Coaches prefer %BM over %Vdec for load selection. Despite this preference, practical considerations heavily influenced their choice of RST methods. Video analysis emerged as the primary tool (63%) for monitoring kinematic changes during RST.
CONCLUSION:
Coaches preferences for %BM over %Vdec, driven by ease and existing literature, highlight an educational gap that needs addressing. Practical considerations strongly influence the selection of RST methods, indicating a potential misalignment between scientific principles and practical application. Coaches acute awareness of technique changes during RST, coupled with concerns about negative impacts on unresisted sprinting, underscores the need for nuanced program design and education.
This study provides valuable insights, suggesting the need for education on load selection methods, and aligning scientific principles with practical considerations. Coaches should be aware of context-specific needs, considering the specific phase of sprinting and sport objectives. Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application is crucial for optimizing RST effectiveness. The findings emphasize the importance of tailored educational initiatives to enhance load selection strategies and promote evidence-based RST program design in coaching practice.