Author(s): DONATH, L., Institution: GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY, Country: GERMANY, Abstract-ID: 2085

INTRODUCTION:
Exercise training load is determined by training volume, intensity and frequency. Training optimization requires training goal setting and programming [1]. However, endurance athletes are at risk to complete unspecific training loads, which refer to any training stimuli that does not elicit desired training responses. The aim of this study is to consider training quality to training programming.
METHODS:
Coaches attribute 80% of the entire training process to non-physical or barely investigated dimensions. The two most important reported criteria of successful physical training are having a detailed plan and an intact socio-emotional bond between athletes and coaches [2]. Studies have further shown that 70% of coaches would describe their training process as prioritized and no clear distinction between planning and periodization are made [3]. Training assessment mainly includes aims, activities, and assessment. In practice, the majority of endurance training groups employ a high volume of training ranging between 600 -1400 annual training hours [4]. 90% of the training time is attributed to aerobic endurance training with 80 to 90% low intensities.
RESULTS:
Coaches mainly utilize a pragmatic periodization model. Endurance training can be distinguished between polarized and unpolarized training. Polarized training is characterized by 80% of training sessions below the intensity of the first lactate threshold. It prevents autonomous dysfunction, high inflammatory responses, and prolonged recovery needs. Different training zones can be targeted by rate of perceived exertion, percentage of maximum heart rate or lactate thresholds. Training quality becomes increasingly important: The STQ scale assesses physical training objectives during training, technical training objectives, and mental and emotional engagement [5].
CONCLUSION:
Training quality assessment during training programming includes planning, execution and debriefing. Recovery and debriefing are key tasks after a training session. Overall, exercise training is a complex arena with adjustments and assessments before, during and after training sessions to ensure high training quality.

1. Haugen, T., et al., Training Quality-An Unexplored Domain in Sport Science. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2023.
2. Anyadike-Danes, K., L. Donath, and J. Kiely, Coaches' Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey. Sports Med, 2023.
3. Anyadike-Danes, K., L. Donath, and J. Kiely, Coaches' Perceptions of Common Planning Concepts Within Training Theory: An International Survey. Sports Med Open, 2023.
4. Sandbakk, O., et al., The Evolution of World-Class Endurance Training: The Scientist's View on Current and Future Trends. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2023.
5. Shell, S.J., et al., Development and validity of the subjective training quality scale. Eur J Sport Sci, 2023.